On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 15:29 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Mike wrote: > > > I can confirm that google-code is automated. I have one project hosted there. > > > > do you think a "happy medium" would work? > > set it up for "instant access" to "owner" but review by Fedora Infrastructure is required > > before read only and/or read write repositories are opened? > > > > I think it's time to chime in on this. I'm generally 100% for self > service but in this case I like the way we have it now. Especially until > a reaping policy can be put in place that people won't flip their lids > about. > > As far as I'm concerned, Fedora Hosted is not a place for fly by night > vaporware and I think having this manual process prevents it a bit. > Having to create a ticket, having to respond when we ask questions, etc, > shows they have at least the commitment to create the project and wait for > it. Does it have its downsides? Yes, you have to wait a little bit. > But this is supposed to be a high quality hosting setup, the cost is a bit > of time. > > Additionally I like the personal touch of having to interact with someone > to actually get this done. To me it feels more like a partnership, there > actually is someone on the other end of this stuff, its not just some > large souless machine. If they've got problems they know exactly where to > go. > > -1 from me unless someone can give me a clear benefit from the views of > Fedora, (and no, making stuff up doesn't count, do research, draw a > conclusion, send your proposition to the list) > > -Mike As one of the initial creators of the Fedora Hosted offerings, I have to agree with Mike McGrath here. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
