Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Mike McGrath wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Dec 2008, Mike McGrath wrote:
>>
>>> I'm going to do our puppet upgrade today, it may start to fail on
>>> some boxes while I'm in the process.
>>>
>>
>> Side note - Changelog (below) includes some fixes for selinux.
>> This is great! But it causes runs to take a very long time. From
>> 60s to 160s. So we have some decisions to make. We can continue
>> to upgrade to 24.6. Or we can wait for 24.7 to come out (this
>> issue is already fixed in head).
Fixed means that puppet uses libselinux-ruby bindings. It also means
that only Fedora >= 9 will have selinux support.
I don't know what the odds are of getting libselinux-ruby built for
RHEL. The versions are considerably different. I haven't even looked
to see if the ruby bindings were part of upstream libselinux-1.33.4,
which is what RHEL-5 currently has (versus 2.0.73 on F-10).
(FWIW, it is a lot faster. Who'd have thunk that forking a shell once
or twice for every file puppet touches would be so slow? ;)
> I don't mind waiting on puppet runs. Unless 24.7 is right around the
> corner, updating is fine by me.
Puppet-0.24.7rc1 was pushed out a week or so ago. I'd expect the full
release within another week or so.
--
Todd OpenPGP -> KeyID: 0xBEAF0CE3 | URL: www.pobox.com/~tmz/pgp
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The inherent vice of capitalism is the unequal sharing of blessings;
the inherent virtue of socialism is the equal sharing of misery.
-- Churchill
Attachment:
pgpYjGo9G1noP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
