On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 30 Oct 2008 23:24:13 -0500, Michael Stahnke wrote: > >> I think I solved the repo-closure/deps scripts issues. Now it should >> be back to sending only one email, (instead of 6). > > If I knew where I could find the original script, I could contribute > proof-reading. I dunno what infrastructure group membership is needed > for that. > > Still missing is to switch repoclosure arch to i686 when running for i386 > repos. EL is i586 and above. Some packages are not available for i386 > and create false positives (e.g. kernel related deps) unless you > set the target arch to i686. > Hmm, that might be why I having odd issues. The problem when I was testing was that every time the dep list was blank. It seemed like that for/else combo was blanking out the container of broken deps. However, if i386 vs i686 understand kernel stuff, then there probably are not any broken deps on the repos I was able to test. The issue with testing is that the repodata for the EPEL repos is assumed to be a local URI in the provided yum.conf. (and you can't get/send mail on pt16) So some repos I could get to and test with, others not so much. Perhaps if just the i386/i686 issue and the single email thing are taken care of, everything will work correctly. Sorry for the confusion. stahnma >> Also, there was an >> indentation issue in the reporting program that was causing the >> dependencies problems to be cleared. > > Not true. Your indentation breaks it. Hint: It's supposed to stay > a for...else statement, not if...else. > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
