On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 21:02 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > So I was going through some old tickets and stumbled across this: > > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/164 > > I gave it a quick look over and I'm not against this integration but I'm > generally apathetic about it. So I ask if anyone here is interested > enough to get it into Fedora. I'm not sure if both the server and client > versions are provided there but it looks like what is there is GPLv2. > > Thoughts? I've been looking at it, here is my thoughts: Fedora CVS: * We'd gain visibility from having people see our commits to packages * As such, we'd be able to show that we are active and not a pack of dodos Fedora Hosted: * SVN: Scripts work natively and I'd really be interested in getting this going for interested projects * Git: Would require a bit more investigation, but it looks 'okay' and possible - I'd be willing to do this * HG: I recall even upstream do this In my opinion, while there are no direct benefits, it does promote some visibility for Fedora/Fedora Hosted/our hosted projects. As such, I'd be willing to step up to the plate and do this. N.B> They are just publicly available scripts, I see no benefit to including such scripts as a separate package, especially as there are so many different scripts for different VCS' the maintainability of such a package would be just NUTS -- Nigel Jones <dev@xxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
