On Thu, 18 Sep 2008, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 18:20 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > Wouldn't it be useful to invite more than person as part of the > > different groups? Currently it seems a number of people have not > > attended which leaves that group voice unheard. > > These are supposed to be representatives from the various groups, who > should have had release meetings on their own already and just reporting > information back to the other groups. Having a 50 person meeting > doesn't work very well. > > Is this just speculation on your part, or is there an actual issue to > talk about? > Also this wasn't a "direction of Fedora" type meeting its a "Ok art team, we need a banner for the release". "Ok releng, we need to make sure that we use get.fedoraproject.org in the release announcement as the primary location to direct people to" type thing. Mostly we go down the checklist that John's been keeping over the last many releases and we make sure that stuff is getting done and that people aren't wrongfully assuming certain tasks are getting done. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
