On Wed, 10 Sep 2008, Jeremy Katz wrote: > On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 22:44 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > > So it seems I'm alone here, if we have to keep everything forever, thats > > what it'll be. I'll just have to see to it we have the resources and > > backup materials in the future when that time comes. I have a question > > and a suggestion for people. > > > > 1) What do we do with projects to which no owner or responsible party can > > be found? This caused major headaches during the elvis move... headaches > > we still have today. What would you have us do? > > I think the idea of making them read-only/owned by an "admin" type group > seems reasonable at first blush. It doesn't get rid of all of the > problems, but it does help with a number of them > > > 2) Right before we start removing projects is _not_ the time to discuss > > the policy. When the policy is put in place... thats the time to discuss > > it. > > I don't disagree at all. I must have missed the initial discussion in > my sea of mail or I would have chimed in then :-/ > no worries, I can admit to blowing my top last night, long day. We'll figure something out. Taking a step back my core concerns are code to which no one is responsible and what to do about that code. _especially_ if its still in use somewhere. It actually complicated the move away from elvis quite a bit and I want to make sure that doesn't happen again. We can look at that philosophically and practically. -Mike _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
