On Tue, 2008-09-09 at 21:20 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote: > I don't see why that project would get removed. I really think I'm > getting misunderstood here. I think that part of the misunderstanding is that I don't see "six months" as equivalent to "stale". We're not even to the seven year point of RHEL 2.1. And there are definitely things that I personally migrated from elvis -> fedorahosted that, while not relevant with "current" distros still are for older RHEL. > 1) we send an email to the group members explaining their project is stale > and asking to remove it. > 2) they respond saying they'd like to not have it removed. (it stays) It stays for how long? If we look at the set of what's being talked about here, I can already tell you that the vast majority are going to fall into the "wanting to be kept" category. Which means that we're doing a lot of administrative overhead for how much gain? > 3) they respond saying its no longer used and it can be removed (we remove > it or they move it elsewhere) > 4) no one responds (it gets removed) Within what time period? And if it later becomes relevant/needed again we just hope that someone has a backup? Jeremy _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
