Warren Togami wrote:
This is the latest draft of New Key repo locations. Jesse Keating points out that the deep levels are necessary because mirrors exclude releases by directory name like "9/". Please let me know if you see any errors in the below.
If 9/ is excluded, wouldn't that mean 9/$releasever/*/os.newkey is also excluded? If it's not, then I guess there's no point in the new directory being created either.
Will the ISOs be respun to reflect the changes as well so that what is in os/ or in os.newkey/ meets what each of the ISO expects? I guess this is primarily relevant to respins, netinstalls and so forth, as the old RPM-GPG-KEYs will be in the root of those ISOs and I can only presume they are used, and people will want to use os.newkey/ as the tree to install from.
Has creating/composing an entirely new 9.1/ release tree been considered? I guess recreating the entire release tree is a PITA (jigdo, iso, torrent, foo) even though updates would not be included other then maybe the updated fedora-release package (with the new rpm-gpg-keys and new repo configuration files)?
Kind regards, Jeroen van Meeuwen -kanarip _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
