On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 22:48 -0600, Michael Yingbull wrote: > We're running it on a regular RHEL machine as well at $dayjob. We've > not seen those problems. Also using Zenoss on Centos 5.2 for monitoring here at $dayjob. I've been keeping it on the current version using their "native" RPM for a year, no issues. Zope is a little bit of a PITA, we just run apache in front of it. I looked at quite a few free monitoring solutions about a year ago, and Zenoss really seemed the most feature full, and definitely best UI. They seem to be developing faster than any of the others as well. The docs are a little rough, but if you have a basic understanding of SNMP it doesn't take that much to figure out. Anyhow, it might be worth your time to try several before committing. > There was an interesting talk at OLS comparing Nagios, Zabbix, Zenoss, > and Hyperic[1] - the upshot was that none of them is a clear > frontrunner > (how's that for being helpful ?) > Zabbix certainly didn't seem very popular at the end vote there. _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list