Re: FAS instance on publictest10?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
> We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
> if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.
I manually updated python-fedora on pt9 to test that as well - so far,
so good, although I still never figured out what was causing the
NoSuchTable errors on publictest10.  

Thanks,
Ricky

Attachment: pgpR23MISbQp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux