Re: puppet and git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mike McGrath wrote:
Sooooo.  We've been doing puppet wrong.  Not really wrong but there's a
better way now using modules.

more info: http://reductivelabs.com/trac/puppet/wiki/PuppetModules

Long story short, I (and probably kanarip if I can sucker  him into it :)
will start converting some stuff that we've got to the more module format.
Some benefits:

 * Easier to share with others
 * Much better organization / easier to find stuff
 * The standard actually involves writing a README file per module.  Thats
   a good thing and can help explain some things better.

Before we go making a bunch of changes I'm going to make sure to keep
everyone in the loop with whats going on.  One thing I did want to discuss
is that puppet does have some native support for git now and people are
using it.  I have to say I'm on the fence about it.  Fedora as an
organization is moving more to git, the websites team already uses it.

What are the thoughts on this list?

I don't see a benefit to using git in this situation but I also don't see how it will cause us any extra pain. A big fat +0 from me.

-Toshio

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Development]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux