On 2/19/08, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2008, Jon Stanley wrote: > > > On Feb 19, 2008 10:45 AM, Jeffrey Ollie <jeff@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > 4) What should the policy on archives be? My proposal: > > > > > > A) All lists must have public archives. The exception would be the > > > default "mailman" list. > > > > Agreed on everything (with Mike's caveats) except for this. There > > *will* be exceptions to this rule. An example that I'm on is > > fedora-freemedia-list - we don't want folks home addresses showing up > > to anyone that cares to look at the archives. > > > > freemedia is a closed list with private archives, because of the > > personal information to be found there. fedora-board-list is another > > one, and I'm sure there's more, dealing with security for example. > > There needs to be a method of exception to the rule. > > Hmm, unfortunately I don't think hosted is the right solution for those > people. We even offer direct rsync access to all of the projects, I had > assumed we'd be doing the same for mail archives. We don't allow any > private data in hosted currently, not sure that we should for the mailing > lists either. Yeah, I would think that a mailing list wouldn't be the best tool for the free media project anyway. I would think that some sort of bug/issue tracking system where bugs/issues could be marked as "private" would be best - that would make it easier to make sure that media requests get handled and don't get lost. Jeff _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
