On Fri, 2008-02-08 at 11:03 +0100, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote: > seth vidal wrote: > > So, > > we're setting up the new torrent tracker and we're debating which > > tracker software to use. > > > > bittorrent: 5.2.0 - released in nov 2007 - it's the last open source > > version b/c apparently the authors got greedy and stupid. > > It's not painfully out of date, though and it would be > > relatively to setup and shift over to it. > > > > ctorrent: theoretically being maintained and theoretically capable of > > being a tracker. It doesn't seem to have any nice > > initscripts. And the configuration for additional trackers > > looks more convulted than might otherwise be desired. Welcome > > to suggestions on initscripts, etc > > > > rtorrent: not obvious this is a tracker at all. It looks more like an > > ncurses-based client. Subpar for our usage. > > > > > > In case anyone is unclear what our usage is. We use the torrent > > tracker/seed as a simple server. We drop files in a directory and they > > are available on the tracker. It logs what went where and lets us get > > data out of it about how many things have been downloaded and from > > where. > > > > Open to suggestions about better tracker software to use. Requirements: > > 1. must be free software > > 2. must log/record stats > > 3. must act sensibly > > > > Is cbtt not on this list for a reason? Fedora Unity has been looking > into using cbtt (from bnbt) and even has some packaging going. > > Kind regards, > yum search bnbt cbtt No Matches found Where can I find it? -sv _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
