Jeffrey Tadlock wrote: > On Jan 30, 2008 8:39 PM, Luke Macken <lmacken@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Stickum[0] has been pretty nice so far in my experience. My only beef with >> http://f3dora.org so far has been the fact that sometimes it's quite >> slow. > > Jonathan can step in with more details, but the f3dora.org slowness is > a hardware resource issue. The f3dora.org box runs the other Fedora > Unity sites as well - on 512MB of RAM. Well, we are running a modified stickum using sqlite as a backend. The server also runs Zope, FDS, Postfix, Amavisd (with all the plugins such as clam, spamassassin, etc), apache, and squid - yes, on 512MB of RAM. It's running in a screen session, so don't judge the performance based on what we have managed to setup. I know it's annoyingly slow (well, it gets there after a little usage) and have been poking infrastructure about getting a Fedora hosted one online. Fedora Unity is getting a server upgrade with 4xRAM (so 2GB) but I don't know when I'll manage to get things migrated. I need to test FDS 1.1 more and see if migration is going to be smooth. -- Jonathan Steffan daMaestro GPG Fingerprint: 93A2 3E2F DC26 5570 3472 5B16 AD12 6CE7 0D86 AF59 _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
