On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 12:31 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, seth vidal wrote: > > > > > On Wed, 2008-01-02 at 11:09 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, Luke Macken wrote: > > > > > > > > It looks like the infofeed has the RPM summary, description, and recent > > > > changelog. Bodhi doesn't know about any of these things, so it will > > > > require some database changes to store it. I've been meaning to have > > > > bodhi grab the recent RPM changelog upon submission for a little while now, > > > > so I don't have a problem implementing this, if we care? > > > > > > > > If we were to display these fields too, it would end up looking like > > > > > > > > name - summary > > > > package description > > > > > > > > update notes > > > > bug list > > > > > > > > rpm changelog > > > > > > > > Is this what we want? > > > > > > Instead of storing this information in the bodhi db is there somewhere > > > else we can get it from? Koji or pkgdb for example. > > > > we have it in the repodata. Which is where the infofeed gets it from :) > > Thats kind of my point actually I know koji stores a lot of this > information in it's database even though the rpms themselves have the > information. I'd hate to continue to duplicate information that we're > already storing all over the place unless there's a real need for it. > well, to be fair the duplication in the infofeeds are pretty minimal. -sv _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
