Mike McGrath wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: >> Mike McGrath wrote: >> >>> Another idea, what good and bad would come from us upgrading to the 1.6 >>> beta? >>> >>> >> What features were you thinking it provides us with? Better ability to >> cache pages? >> > > That, the other thing I'm thinking of is if we're going to start > patching our instance heavily, perhaps we want to stick with 1.6. I > don't necessarily want to upgrade to 1.6 but I do want us to talk about it. > Very good point. That would definitely be another reason to move to 1.6 so we're closer to the code base that our patches are going to apply to upstream. >> Here's another thought: is it only page saves which are causing us >> problems? I think moin has a similar URL for all actions that cause >> writing to the disk. For instance, saving an edit appears to call >> PAGENAME#preview and starting an edit uses PAGENAME?action=edit. Could >> we cluster just requests to read from the wiki and filter writes to a >> single app server by using these URLs? >> > > The page saves are causing our inability to cluster Moin in any > efficient way. I've thought about altering proxy location by action, > that would help with some things but I've yet to set it up and see if it > works the way we think it will. (for example, altering the user, > watched pages, etc are still a question mark in my head). > It looks like subscribing to a page and starting the user preferences editor via the link in the sidebar can be grabbed via the ?action= string as well. Saving of the User Preferences page looks like it doesn't use a special URL but perhaps sending all POST requests to the writable server would catch that. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
