On Dec 13, 2007 5:55 AM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:33:19 -0600 > Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > we've had a request to support monotone on hosted. Instead of having > > this conversation in private I thought it best to put it on the > > list. So thoughts? This is part "do we want to support monotone" and > > part "do we want hosted to be more then svn, hg, git, bzr". > > > > In general I'm happy supporting only those 4, we can't be everything > > for everyone and AFAIK we're the only OSS project with a hosted > > offering that supports 4 SCM's. > > > So far, the SCMs we support have been driven mostly by the SCMs that > Trac supports, with the exception to bzr which I had nothing to do with > setting up. There's trac support for monotone http://tracmtn.1erlei.de/ ; but it won't answer all your questions. > > So the questions are, does Trac support monotone, does monotone lend > itself to a hosted environment (easy ssh commit access, http anon > access, useful web browser, easy to create empty repos for developers > to fill, etc...), is it in EPEL, does it have a security track record, > and uh... is there anybody on the infrastructure team that feels like > they could become our site expert on it? > > -- > Jesse Keating > Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours? > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > > _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
