On Dec 12, 2007 11:24 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > On Dec 12, 2007 9:22 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > >> On Wed, 12 Dec 2007 22:56:04 -0500 > >> seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >>> cvs > >>> > >> AFAIK we don't actually offer CVS for hosted projects. Trac doesn't > >> support it, and our first rule should be "Do No Harm" (: > >> > >> > > > > I thought the first rule was "Be Evil" and then "Do More Harm". I mean > > we should be supporting RCS (it works great over SSH) and SCCS. > > > > I have to admit I am worried about slippery slope. I'd hate to support > a VCS that only has 2 or 3 repos on it. Especially if its not one we > have in-house expertise with. > > -Mike > > > _______________________________________________ > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > I tend to think if you can't use one of the vc systems already provided, you need specialty hosting and with that, probably a lot of care and feeding. We are already offering the most common SCMs in use (except CVS ^^ see above). Always saying 'yes' and allowing new things to pop up is not maintainable in the long term. I am actually surprised we offer as many SCMs as we do. stahnma _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
