On Thu, 06 Dec 2007 22:53:22 +0100 Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Do Dezember 6 2007, Jonathan Steffan wrote: > > > The current updates system is getting better each release, but I > > think we should adjust our policies to also have an > > “updates-archive” repository. This repository will include all > > signed updates that had once lived in the updates repo, for the > > duration of the releases life-cycle. I don't expect all mirrors > > would want to carry this extra > > Once the repositories are presto enabled, an updates-archive with all > the delta rpms would not take as much space as a full rpm repository > but provide the same functionality. Yes, this is correct. I left it out of the letter due to the need for a specific client to deal with the presto data. PyJigdo could do such a task, if this is the route we want to go. -- Jonathan Steffan daMaestro GPG Fingerprint: 93A2 3E2F DC26 5570 3472 5B16 AD12 6CE7 0D86 AF59 _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list