On 12/3/07, Michael Stahnke <mastahnke@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Dec 3, 2007 4:33 PM, seth vidal <skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2007-12-03 at 16:24 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > > Anyone know of any mail list software besides mailman that they've used > > > and like? I ask because I'm not a huge fan of mailman. The hosted > > > mailing list will probably have precedence and I think it is likely that > > > whatever we do in hosted is what we'll end up doing with the rest of > > > Fedora's mail lists when the time comes. > > > > > > > then we should stick with mailman, if only b/c it is definitely the path > > of least resistance and it is what everyone knows. > > > > alternatively you can look at the neverending perl-module-pain that is > > sympa > > > > -sv > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list > > Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list > > > several projects are switching to google-groups for mailling lists. I > am not sure I like the idea. It's certainly isn't open source, but I > thought I'd throw it out there as an option. > stahnma > What kind of pains are you having with Mailman? Google-groups is nice, but I think Mailman edges out with a few more features. I briefly looked Google-groups to replace Mailman that I use for my personal mailing lists. Maybe it is that I am more familiar with Mailman, but I felt that Mailman was more mailing list centric. Whereas Google-groups leaned more towards a discussion group. There is also the whole control argument, but I do not know if that applies here. Regards, Jason Hartley _______________________________________________ Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list Fedora-infrastructure-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
