On Fri, 2007-02-02 at 19:32 +0200, Ahmed Kamal wrote: > One tiny thing I am facing is the naming convention to be used for the > resulting drpms. This name needs to reflect both versions for which > this delta was made. I am thinking I need to use something like: > " name-VerNew-RelNew-VerOld-RelOld.arch.drpm" > Not sure if this would cause any issues, I mean not using the standard > rpm naming scheme. But then again, this is not a rpm, which is why I > chose suffix .drpm instead of say .delta.rpm > Let me know what you guys think > What does SuSE use when they generate delata-rpms? (I do like drpm better than delta.rpm). -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
