On Tue, 2007-01-23 at 19:15 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > On 1/23/07, Rahul Sundaram <sundaram@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi > > > > Why is the archives of this list not public? If sensitive details are > > being discussed in this list, the list membership itself should be > > moderated which is not the case at present. If anyone can join the list, > > I dont see any harm in letting search engines and other services index > > the content. > > > > We do have a private (invite only) list that we use for sensitive > things though its rarely used, last message was in early November. > I'm conflicted about this so I will defer to the community. Basically > I guess what we're trying to accomplish is to let search engines index > the list? I don't have a problem with infrastructure-list being viewable by all. In fact, I probably would find it beneficial to have it available. As you say sysadmin-list exists if there's things that need to be discussed in true privacy. -Toshio
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
