On Wednesday 17 January 2007 11:27, Mike McGrath wrote: > On 1/17/07, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wednesday 17 January 2007 11:17, seth vidal wrote: > > > Buzzword, buzzword, marketing-speak, buzzword buzzword. > > > > close-source software, buzzword, marketing-speak > > Perhaps we should write a policy and get it board approved. "We will > not run any software that does not meet the approval of one of our > licenses" Are we currently breaking that rule anywhere in our > infrastructure? If you consider internal Red Hat stuff, like Brew for core, distill for composing core (at least FC6), the update tool currently used, those are all closed source, but replacements or opensourceing of all of these are in progress. > > It'd be nice to just point him to the policy so they know. We've had > people ask us in the past to install stuff. > -Mike yeah... -- Jesse Keating Release Engineer: Fedora
Attachment:
pgpy4NuE1URFP.pgp
Description: PGP signature
