On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 08:58 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote: > Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > > On Tue, 2006-12-19 at 14:14 +0100, Axel Thimm wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 10:23:31PM -0600, Jeffrey C. Ollie wrote: > >>> Another option to look into for configuration management: > > Has anyone looked at puppet? > http://reductivelabs.com/projects/puppet/ I haven't looked at Puppet in depth, but one con is that it's written in Ruby (not that there's anything wrong with that). But there may be license issues with bcfg2 so that may be an option as well. > Or cfengine for that matter, though I'm getting dissatisfied with it myself. I haven't looked at cfengine yet either, but from what I've seen it's cryptic configuration is a major con. Jeff
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
