Le Lun 26 novembre 2007 15:25, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit : > As you saw already, these are packaged as mgopen-fonts. The mgopen > project, however, does not seem to be making any progress beyond the > first release of the fonts. Same thing as what happened to Vera. The various people wanting to make the fonts evolve need to agree on a new FLOSS upstream like it happened to DejaVu. IMHO we should not package all the MGOpen derivatives before a clear new upstream emerges. >> GFS Didot >> GFS Bodoni >> GFS Neohellenic >> GFS Artemisia >> GFS Theokritos >> GFS Olga >> GFS Didot Classic >> GFS Porson >> GFS Baskerville >> GFS Bodoni Classic >> GFS Gazis >> GFS Solomos >> GFS Porson >> GFS Complutum > > I plan to package the above some time if noone beats me to it. Already done but now the packages await review (half of them at least). > When the > tetex->TeXLive dust settles, I plan to also package the TeX-related > bindings. If you know tex please do Computer Modern Unicode - he's stuck waiting for someone that understands tex to write a specfile that allows building it from Fedora TEX in Fedora fontforge. > A side question: Does anyone have experience about packaging the same > font both for X11 and TeX? Do I need to include the same font files > twice? Create soft/hard links for efficiency? Require one (X11) for > the other (TeX)? As I already answered bitmap and core X11 fonts users : the wiki is open for new guidelines, as long as they respect our general packaging policy http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Fonts/Packaging/Policy Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
