Le Mer 7 novembre 2007 11:46, Frederic Crozat a écrit : > for serif and sans-serif, we are favoring DejaVu over Bitstream Vera > (since Vera is not changing anymore, unlike DejaVu which is also > changing for latin glyphs). Should we do the same upstream ? I've pushed upstream (@dejavu) the fontconfig files we use to achieve this effect @fedora. If the fonconfig maintainers stance on Dejavu changed they could be moved to fontconfig. Last time the issue vas discussed there was some opposition to preferring dejavu at the fontconfig level. Also I rather prefer distributed policy in separate files, since that means they're only deployed if the font packages themselves are installed on the system (instead of mucking with .avail symlinks, and trying to manage a centralised policy everyone patches anyway). > Related question : we are favoring free fonts (also because we aren't > enabling patented bytecode interpreter) over MS fonts, by pushing Luxi > and Nimbus over Verdana and Arial (or Andale Mono, Courier New). We're dropping Luxi @fedora since the license forbids modification and you have alternatives with more liberal licenses available nowadays. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
