Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: why not dejavu-lgc-fonts 2.20. why redundancy https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=354991 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-27 04:25 EST ------- dejavu and dejavu-lgc have historically been two different packages built two different ways and maintained by two different persons. So they've not always been in sync. Since both are used as default fonts by a lot of people we've avoided pushing updates after the last test releases, as people complain in a big way if their default font was broken. dejavu and dejavu-lgc entered F8T3 with different levels and therefore will hit F8 with different levels (also most of the fixes in 2.20 where out of the lgc range) For F9 dejavu and dejavu-lgc will be built from the same source package so they'll always be in sync in the future (http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=22419) I'm not sure if we want to take the risk of offering 2.21 as a F8 update when it's released. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-fonts-list mailing list Fedora-fonts-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-fonts-list
