Hi, --- On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | I think it could be accepted. However, it would be better that Fedora | Legal add it into the licensing matrix: | http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing | | Please ask the Fedora Legal about this. \-- I have asked Fedora Legal for feedback. In this regard, if we were to package VHDL and Verilog cores under an open hardware license, I would like to know as to how we should package them into FEL? For example, if we package opencores.org cores, do we have a naming convention like opencores.org-<project-name>, and put them under /usr/share/opencores.org/<project-name>, or just /usr/share/<project-name>? Or, do we need to come up packaging guidelines for hardware designs that people can use with FEL tools? Appreciate your inputs in this regard, SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com _______________________________________________ Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list Fedora-electronic-lab-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list
