On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Thomas Sailer wrote: > The main problem IMO is that the "user interface" (read the command > language) has changed significantly, to the point that pretty much none > of my netlists that worked with 0.35 work anymore. And I have not real > idea how to fix this, because documentation and examples are scarce. If your netlists are opensource, can you place a copy on our FEL git repo please ? It will serve a testing. Little by little we are setting up a testing suite which we can use to ensure that the EDA softwares are working on the Livedvd. https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/wiki/developers#UsingFELgitrepository > Can you elaborate? I have characterized a couple of commercial libraries > by now using an ngspice CVS snapshot between rework19 and rework20, and > now with your rework20 package. Earlier versions indeed had some > limitations (missing .measure features) that made characterizing > advanced flops impossible, but then again pharosc doesn't have any > advanced flops. Indeed the .measure features were missing. Do you want to co-maintain ngspice with me ? But if you are pulling some features from CVS, other users will have the same issues. As for pharosc, I had to strip winspice and other binaries from the sources. I don't know about what exactly. However GrahamPetley sometimes talk about them. If you need more information, it's better to start another thread with him in CC: so that we can track every missing feature. Chitlesh -- Chitlesh GOORAH Fedora Electronic Lab Architect http://spins.fedoraproject.org/fel _______________________________________________ Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list Fedora-electronic-lab-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list
