On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 7:06 AM, Rakesh Pandit <> wrote: > Thanks Chitlesh, I will pick it up in a day or two. But, are you bit of sure > that snapshots are stable enough to be pushed in rawhide. > > I would surely push it in rawhide and sort of test it a bit, before planning > for stable. In case you can confirm that it is stable enough in rawhide then > in a week or so we can push it to testing. > > @ cc gcompris maintainer . I haven't yet tested these gnucap snapshots. However Al Davis is regularly releasing gnucap snapshots. So if we feed him with our feedbacks, I think he will be pleased to get them fixed. But if it breaks gcompris then we shouldn't update it. I would suggest that you create some scratch builds and put them into your FASusername.fedorapeople.org for the time being and notify the FEL's mailing list when you update your private builds. Hence we can test them. http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list The reason why I want to get these gnucap snapshots is because we have 7 standard cell libraries (more than 300MB) (pharosc) which needs to be re-characterised, especially those of 0.13µm. Upstream is using "winspice" to characterise them since some features on gnucap or ngspice are still missing for such advanced characterisations. Kind regards, Chitlesh _______________________________________________ Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list Fedora-electronic-lab-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list
