Hi, --- On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:34 AM, Chitlesh GOORAH <chitlesh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: | Shakthi has recently encountered a situation where I think upstream of | his package is pretty non-responsive, that we can call it dead | upstream. \-- Actually, I got one reply yesterday, but, I have been pushing this way too far, and way too long! One of the authors forgot to "Reply all", unfortunately. I have sent some queries, and hopefully will get some answers. It is good code, just that it has been unmaintained for many years. --- | As far as I'm concerned, I would rather want to take over the upstream | responsibilities and little by little migrate the code/features to an | active upstream of existing opensource EDA software. In other words, | improve the existing supported opensource EDA tools. \-- Do you want to put these tasks as low priority, or do you want these to be taken by any new-comers who can use it as a learning exercise? Is it possible for you to prioritise the tickets? Let me know, SK -- Shakthi Kannan http://www.shakthimaan.com _______________________________________________ Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list Fedora-electronic-lab-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list
