#24: package espresso - it's said that even cadence based their tools from it
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Reporter: chitlesh | Owner: shakthimaan
Type: task | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 12 'Constantine'
Component: digital design | Version: devel
Resolution: | Keywords:
-----------------------------+----------------------------------------------
Changes (by shakthimaan):
* owner: shakthimaan* => shakthimaan
* status: new => assigned
Comment:
Package Review at:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=516849
.spec at: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/espresso-ab.spec
.src.rpm at: http://shakthimaan.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/espresso-
ab-1.0-1.fc11.src.rpm
Successful Koji build for FC-10 and FC-11:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598561
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598567
Build fails for dist-5E-epel and dist-5E-epel-testing-candidate:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598587
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=1598585
1. Is it ok if we don't ship it for RHEL?
2. Do we also want to package eqntott?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab/ticket/24#comment:3>
Fedora Electronic Lab <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-electronic-lab>
Design, Simulate and Program electronics.
_______________________________________________
Fedora-electronic-lab-list mailing list
Fedora-electronic-lab-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-electronic-lab-list
