Question on cloning and replication . . .

[Matthew Harmsen <mharmsen@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Everyone,

I received the following from a community member who is using Dogtag and 389:

I have 2 questions and 1 note.

Note:

Here is an interesting thing that I noticed during CA cloning:

When CA to be cloned has secure connection DS enabled, cloning process fails.

None of docs:

• https://www.dogtagpki.org/wiki/PKI_10.5_Installing_CA_Clone
• https://github.com/dogtagpki/pki/blob/DOGTAG_10_6_BRANCH/docs/installation/Installing_CA_Clone.md
• https://github.com/dogtagpki/pki/blob/master/docs/installation/ca/Installing_CA_Clone.md

is covering this issue.

Solution here is to use

pki_clone_replication_master_port=389
pki_clone_replication_clone_port=389
pki_clone_replication_security=None

https://github.com/dogtagpki/pki/blob/DOGTAG_10_5_BRANCH/base/server/etc/default.cfg#L255

Question 1 (sorry, bit long):

When CA is cloned both DS servers have nsslapd-referral attribute set in dn: cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config entries

so DS on vm-users4.hostname.com

would have

dn: cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsslapd-referral: ldap://vm-users3.hostname.com:389/o%3Dpki-tomcat-CA

and DS on vm-users3.hostname.com

dn: cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsslapd-referral: ldap://vm-users4.hostname.com:389/o%3Dpki-tomcat-CA

I wonder what is the meaning of nsslapd-referral attribute?

The reason I'm asking is that I was thinking that for replication over SSL maybe nsslapd-referral should be modified

from  ldap://vm-users4.hostname.com:389/o%3Dpki-tomcat-CA

to      ldaps://vm-users4.hostname.com:636/o%3Dpki-tomcat-CA

but when I did this nsslapd-referral attribute was reverted to original value by DS automatically,

so I'm trying to make sure if nsslapd-referral attribute should be left unchanged during enabling of SSL to DS replication?

Just in case here is a sample of all changes on both DS (hopefully, I didn't miss anything to have properly configured replication over SSL):

vm-users4.hostname.com:
------------------------------------
dn: cn=config
nsslapd-security: on

dn: cn=RSA,cn=encryption,cn=config
nsSSLPersonalitySSL: slapd-vm-users4
nsSSLToken: internal (software)
nsSSLActivation: on

dn: cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsslapd-referral: ldap://vm-users3.hostname.com:389/o%3Dpki-tomcat-CA

dn: cn=cloneAgreement1-vm-users4.hostname.com-pki-tomcat,cn=replica,cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsDS5ReplicaPort: 636
nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: SSL

vm-users3.hostname.com:
------------------------------------
dn: cn=config
nsslapd-security: on

dn: cn=RSA,cn=encryption,cn=config
nsSSLPersonalitySSL: slapd-vm-users3
nsSSLToken: internal (software)
nsSSLActivation: on

dn: cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsslapd-referral: ldap://vm-users4.hostname.com:389/o%3Dpki-tomcat-CA

dn: cn=masterAgreement1-vm-users4.hostname.com-pki-tomcat,cn=replica,cn=o\3Dpki-tomcat-CA,cn=mapping tree,cn=config
nsDS5ReplicaPort: 636
nsDS5ReplicaTransportInfo: SSL

Question 2:

DS has so called "SSF Restrictions" (https://directory.fedoraproject.org/docs/389ds/howto/howto-use-ssf-restrictions.html}

which may be configured by setting nsslapd-minssf attribute in cn=config entry.

Default value of nsslapd-minssf attribute is 0. W

Minimum SSF configuration setting can be used to define the minimum level of encryption that is required.

Do you know what this means?

Should I be concerned?

By the way, when is set nsslapd-minssf attribute to 128, DS becomes inaccessible and CA is not working.

Thanks in advance for any answers,
-- Matt

P. S. - A copy of this email has also been sent to pki-devel@xxxxxxxxxx.

_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx