Re: Issue with building RPMs with ASAN_ON

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> 
> Memalign is pretty important - the short version is "we can not remove it".
> I didn't say "remove", I said "review".
> 
> There are some structures in the code that rely on this for performance to guarantee that they memory is aligned to a page boundary, or cache line boundary. In some cases it's required to allow the atomics to work in nunc-stans (well, lfds, but the value of that today is questionable when the rust version is possibly safer and faster). 
> Since you're the expert in this area, maybe you can leave a comment in the issue linked above with the justification for upstream to reconsider?

You mean upstream LSAN/ASAN in this case, yes? 


—
Sincerely,

William Brown

Senior Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux