> On 11 Feb 2019, at 17:01, Anuj Borah <aborah@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As 'Entry' is not allowed to use now , In replace of Entry we are suggested to use UserAccounts and UserAccount which is very limited to some object classes . (['account','posixaccount','inetOrgPerson','organizationalPerson’]
> )
>
There are many other types than this though?
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:23:class Plugin(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:199:class MEPConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:233:class MEPTemplate(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:444:class ReferentialIntegrityConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:758:class MemberOfSharedConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:887:class AutoMembershipRegexRule(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:905:class AutoMembershipDefinition(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:1015:class AutoMembershipRegexRule(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:1120:class LinkedAttributesConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:1551:class AccountPolicyConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/plugins.py:1598:class DNAPluginConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/organizationalrole.py:17:class OrganizationalRole(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/nscontainer.py:11:class nsContainer(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/nscontainer.py:49:class nsHiddenContainer(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/domain.py:11:class Domain(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/posixgroup.py:18:class PosixGroup(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/organization.py:17:class Organization(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/ipadomain.py:11:class IpaDomain(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/group.py:17:class Group(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/group.py:104:class UniqueGroup(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/organizationalunit.py:16:class OrganizationalUnit(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/idm/account.py:15:class Account(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/tombstone.py:18:class Tombstone(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/backend.py:393:class Backend(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/backend.py:831:class DatabaseConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/tasks.py:24:class Task(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/pwpolicy.py:287:class PwPolicyEntry(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/config.py:28:class Config(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/config.py:205:class Encryption(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/config.py:233:class RSA(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/config.py:358:class LDBMConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/monitor.py:16:class Monitor(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/monitor.py:109:class MonitorLDBM(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/monitor.py:143:class MonitorBackend(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/monitor.py:190:class MonitorChaining(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/saslmap.py:12:class SaslMapping(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/index.py:27:class Index(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/index.py:64:class VLVSearch(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/index.py:147:class VLVIndex(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/encrypted_attributes.py:15:class EncryptedAttr(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/_mapped_object.py:84:class DSLdapObject(DSLogging):
src/lib389/lib389/_mapped_object.py:441: if not issubclass(type(obj1), DSLdapObject) or not issubclass(type(obj2), DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/_mapped_object.py:442: raise ValueError("Invalid arguments: Expecting object types that inherits 'DSLdapObject' class")
src/lib389/lib389/agreement.py:23:class Agreement(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/cos.py:18:class CosTemplate(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/cos.py:65:class CosIndirectDefinition(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/cos.py:111:class CosPointerDefinition(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/replica.py:881:class Replica(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/replica.py:1288:class BootstrapReplicationManager(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/mappingTree.py:381:class MappingTree(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/chaining.py:18:class ChainingConfig(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/chaining.py:59:class ChainingDefault(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/chaining.py:81:class ChainingLink(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/changelog.py:20:class Changelog5(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/rootdse.py:15:class RootDSE(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/referral.py:14:class Referral(DSLdapObject):
src/lib389/lib389/schema.py:71:class Schema(DSLdapObject):
At worst, you can always use a raw:
DSLdapObject(instance, dn)
to get “minimal” access to *anything* regardless of type. The entire value proposition of lib389 is that we wrap *the most common and useful types*. Each one of these sub-classes of DSLdapObject provides wrappers, helps, guides, functions and more to interacting with nearly every aspect of the server.
>
> This way we will be able to create any kind of entry whether it may be user/role/sub suffix or anything .
I think this is already a solved problem, so I don’t think we really need this? See above,
>
> Please let me know what other changes i have to do to make more sophisticated.
>
> Regards
> Anuj Borah
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
—
Sincerely,
William Brown
Software Engineer, 389 Directory Server
SUSE Labs
_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
