Re: PR's might now be an option!

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:33:35AM +1000, William Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> We recently have completed two PR based merges, both went successfully.
> 
> I think it's time we bring up again the option of allowing PR's as a
> main workflow for the project.
> 
> I think we can allow both PR + patch for the time, they do not exclude
> each other.
> 
> What do we think? Are we okay to proceed with this? 
I am okay with it too.

> 
> -- 
> Sincerely,
> 
> William Brown
> Software Engineer
> Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
> _______________________________________________
> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux