On Fri, 2017-07-14 at 17:15 +1000, William Brown wrote: > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/49325 > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/8ef878a1004308b10982350df76c0378063147024706bdc774bd8b755e07cd67-0001-Ticket-49325-Proof-of-concept-rust-tqueue-in-sds.patch > > _______________________________________________ > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/issue/raw/177ec1c917aa306b5e0006eddad8b805325af5ee3a47afc8b92c53b63dc92f5c-0001-Ticket-49325-Proof-of-concept-rust-tqueue-in-sds.patch Updated based on comments from jistone. It's worth noting the Rust queue is now *faster* than the C queue with work on optimisation. Additionally, thanks to some work with rustc, it's leak free and proven correct with asan, -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
