On Tue, 2017-04-25 at 07:17 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote: > > On 04/25/2017 01:05 AM, William Brown wrote: > > Hi Mark / others > > > > Given that one of our community members (ankity) is hitting up against > > some issues, and the function they need is in the ReplicaLegacy object, > > maybe it's time we bit the bullet and broke the old ReplicaObject in > > favour of the new one? It would be worth us sinking some time down into > > this improvement, as it's going to help ease people into lib389 in the > > future. > I would like to get rid of all the legacy classes. What does this > impact, just the existing CI tests? Yes, it would probably affect many of these tests, but most of the damage would be the topology module. Thankfully, it's only one place to fix, then it's just cleanup. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > -- Sincerely, William Brown Software Engineer Red Hat, Australia/Brisbane
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
