Noriko Hosoi wrote: > On 11/17/2016 06:36 AM, Rob Crittenden wrote: >> William Brown wrote: >>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/49041 >>> >>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/49041/0001-Ticket-49041-SSL-fails-to-start-due-to-NSS-db-versio.patch >>> >>> >>> I think this should be reviewed urgently and backported. This can cause >>> SSL to fail to start on F24 and higher without explanation. >> key4.db and cert9.db are the sqlite databases. Does 389-ds support >> specifying sql:/path/to/database/dir? >> >> rob >> _______________________________________________ >> 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > We have a plan to switch [1] but when we discussed in the team, we > concluded it was not urgent. I don't think NSS stops supporting the old > BDB format very soon? My question revolves around how likely this is to happen to make it urgent. If 389-ds doesn't support sqlite databases then how are key4/cert9 files going to end up being created? Or is sqlite now the default format for the NSS utilities so merely using certutil would generate them? rob _______________________________________________ 389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to 389-devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
