Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2016 11:43:27 -0600 From: Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [389-devel] Re: Sign compare checking To: 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Message-ID: <a7fdb987-8efa-d26d-08c1-3cf0ecb59c5e@xxxxxxxxxx> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------ 2A83E5142B304396ABB138B7"
Part of the problem is that we wanted to support being able to use both mozldap and openldap, without too much "helper" code/macros/#ifdef MOZLDAP/etc. It looks as though this is a place where we need to have some sort of helper. (as for why we still support mozldap - we still need an ldap c sdk that supports NSS for crypto until we can fix that in the server. Once we change 389 so that it can use openldap with openssl/gnutls for crypto, we should consider deprecating support for mozldap.)
What support for MozNSS is OpenLDAP lacking? Support for MozNSS has been in there for ages now.
Patches to make Mozilla work with OpenLDAP instead of mozldap have also been available for ages. https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=292127#c17 through comment #30
-- -- Howard Chu CTO, Symas Corp. http://www.symas.com Director, Highland Sun http://highlandsun.com/hyc/ Chief Architect, OpenLDAP http://www.openldap.org/project/ -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
