Re: Please review: nunc stans 57, job state machine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 07:49 -0400, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> On 07/13/2016 02:28 AM, William Brown wrote:
> > On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 14:47 +1000, William Brown wrote:
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/ticket/57
> >>
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/57/0001-Ticket-57-Implement-a-strict-state-machine-for-nunc-.patch
> >>
> >> https://fedorahosted.org/nunc-stans/attachment/ticket/57/0002-Ticket-57-Update-the-configure-and-autotools-files.patch
> >>
> >> May not apply without #51, #54, #56
> >>
> > Mentioned it in the ticket, but this builds and works with git master of
> > DS with ldclt. So the code is "reliable" from that aspect. 
> Can you please run the attached connection stress test script as well
> (for 24 hours)?  I'm worried that you are introducing a lot of changes
> like might cause regressions.

That's a very valid concern: my work is of course trying to improve the
reliability, but more testing is always a good idea. 

I will setup an environment and run these today. 

Thanks!

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux