Re: Logging performance improvement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2016-06-30 at 20:01 -0600, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 06/30/2016 07:52 PM, William Brown wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I've been thinking about this for a while, so I decided to dump my
> > thoughts to a document. I think I won't get to implementing this for a
> > while, but it would really help our server performance.
> >
> > http://www.port389.org/docs/389ds/design/logging-performance-improvement.html
> 
> Looks good.  Can we quantify the current log overhead?

Sure, I could probably sit down and work out a way to bench mark
this ..... 

But without the alternative being written, hard to say. I could always
patch out logging and drop the lock in a hacked build so we can show
what "without logging contention" looks like? 

> 
> >
> >
> > --
> > 389-devel mailing list
> > 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> 
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

-- 
Sincerely,

William Brown
Software Engineer
Red Hat, Brisbane

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux