On 10/19/2015 04:18 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:02 AM, Simon Pichugin wrote:
Hi team,
I am working now on the fixing lib389 broken tests:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/48303
And it's time for dsadmin_* tests. Can anybody, please, tell me more
about it?
As I see, Mark and Thierry worked on it, but any other team
members are welcomed too. :)
I think all I did for it was to make it python 3 compliant. I think
it was a work-in-progress fora future CLI interface. Thierry can
probably answer this for sure, but it s definitely not being used at
the moment.
Hello Simon, Marc,
lib389 comes from https://github.com/richm/dsadmin.
After some time dsadmin word was removed from lib389 but you can still
find some reference on it.
The lib389-test have been moved to components tests (replica, backend,
index..) and I think dsadmin is deprecated in those tests.
You may rename some of the dsadmin tests to the component they are testing.
bug_harness.py was used in dsadmin but is no longer used in lib389. If
you can remove the dependency on it (if it exists some) it would be good.
thanks
theirry
I have a few questions:
1) What should we do with dsadmin_* tests and its coverage?
- for example, we have "TypeError: 'NoneType' object is not
callable" after
- topology.conn.replica.changelog and
- topology.conn.backend.add
- or "AttributeError: DirSrv has no attribute 'getMTEntry'" after
- topology.conn.getMTEntry('o=MISSING')
And it is only a few revealed after first run.
2) Should we rename dsadmin_* tests somehow? (there is no dsadmin
project anymore)
3) Do we need bug_harness.py or is it obsolete?
Again, I think Thierry can answer these questions best.
Regards,
Mark
Please, provide me with details.
Thanks,
Simon
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
