Re: [389-devel] if you tag a release, please release a tarball too

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 19.09.2014 17:42, Rich Megginson wrote:
> On 09/19/2014 01:15 AM, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>> On 19.09.2014 09:33, Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>>>     Hi
>>>
>>>   1.3.3.3 is tagged in git since a week ago, but there's no tarball for
>>> it. Dunno if you have scripts for the release dance, but if you do
>>> please include the tarball build to it so it's not a manual thing to
>>> remember every time ;)
>>>
>>> I'll roll back to 1.3.3.2 in the meantime..
>> oh well, 1.3.3.2 tarball doesn't match the tag:
>>
>> tarball doesn't have 55e317f2a5d8fc488e7eeee6f2b4155298a45d25 nor
>> 0363fa49265c0c27d510064cea361eb400802548
>>
>> and ldap/servers/slapd/ssl.c has a diff to the comments of the cipher
>> mess (from 58cb12a7b8cf9), and VERSION.sh on the tarball still has
>> 'VERSION_PREREL=.a1' (should be gone in fefa20138b6a3a)
>>
>> so I don't know where the tarball was built from, this isn't cool..
>>
>>
> Yep, we screwed up, sorry about that.  I've just uploaded a new 1.3.3.3
> release, and the sources page with the new checksum is building.

Thanks! Much better :)


-- 
t
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux