Please discard my review request. It turned out the "undo" does not
work in some cases.
Noriko Hosoi wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47763
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47763/0001-Ticket-47763-winsync-plugin-modify-is-broken.2.patch
git patch file (master; take 2) -- Resurrected original
attr_compare_equal
#47763: winsync plugin modify is broken
---------------------------------+---------------------------
Reporter: rmeggins | Owner: nhosoi
Type: defect | Status: assigned
Priority: major | Milestone: 1.3.1.23
Component: Sync Service | Version: 1.3.0
Resolution: | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
Review: review? | Ticket origin: Community
Red Hat Bugzilla: |
---------------------------------+---------------------------
Comment (by rmeggins):
Replying to [comment:13 nhosoi]:
> Replying to [comment:11 rmeggins]:
> > Why change the value comparison to be length aware? This is a big
change in behavior. It means e.g. that "fo" == "foo". Is this
necessary?
>
> Since we don't hear from the author, shall I back off the change
on this
compare function and retest it?
> 384 391 attr_compare_equal(Slapi_Attr *a, Slapi_Attr *b)
ok
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
