Re: [389-devel] strcasestr vs. PL_strcasestr

Rich Megginson <rmeggins@xxxxxxxxxx> · Fri, 07 Mar 2014 07:32:50 -0700



    On 03/07/2014 07:15 AM, Carsten Grzemba
      wrote:

    
    Hi
      Nathan,

      
      is there special reason why you use strcasestr in ACL
      plugin instead of PL_strcasestr.

      It presents me some headache to build 1.3.2 on Solaris 10.

https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/commit/ldap/servers/plugins/acl?id=95214606df95deb1cf9a30044fe64f780c030b34

    
    No, there is no reason to use strcasestr.  We should be using
    PL_strcasestr for portability.

    
      Carsten

      
      Am 06.03.14 schrieb Noriko Hosoi 
        <nhosoi@xxxxxxxxxx>:
      
        https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47731

          
          https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47731/0001-Ticket-47731-A-tombstone-entry-is-deleted-by-ldapdel.patch

          
          Description: A tombstone deletion by ldapdelete op from client
          is 

          supposed to fail. The failure from
          SLAPI_PLUGIN_BETXNPOSTOPERATION was 

          ignored in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 plugin_call_func and it was not
          passed to 

          the backend to abort. This patch added the check in the same
          way as in 

          389-ds-base-1.3.1 and newer.

          --

          389-devel mailing list

          389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

          https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
      
      
      --
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
    
    
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel