[389-devel] Regarding changing instance specific scripts to be "global/generic"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



There has been a request to remove instance specific scripts, and make them generic and placed in /usr/sbin/

https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/528


Should we remove all the scripts from /usr/lib64/dirsrv/slapd-INSTANCE:

bak2db db2index dn2rdn ldif2ldap ns-newpwpolicy.pl start-slapd usn-tombstone-cleanup.pl bak2db.pl db2index.pl fixup-linkedattrs.pl monitor restart-slapd stop-slapd verify-db.pl cleanallruv.pl db2ldif fixup-memberof.pl ns-accountstatus.pl restoreconfig suffix2instance vlvindex db2bak db2ldif.pl ldif2db ns-activate.pl saveconfig syntax-validate.pl db2bak.pl dbverify ldif2db.pl ns-inactivate.pl schema-reload.pl upgradednformat

It appears almost of these are all instance specific. Do we want to make all of these "generic" and stick them in /usr/sbin?

However, I think it makes sense to keep some instance specific scripts: monitor, stop/start/restart, maybe the "task" scripts too (like schema reload, cleanallruv, fix-memberof, etc). Then only make the database scripts generic: db2ldif db2index, ldif2db, db2bak, bak2db, etc.

Just curious what everyone thinks about this.

Thanks,
Mark

--
Mark Reynolds
Red Hat, Inc
mreynolds@xxxxxxxxxx

--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel



[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux