[389-devel] Please review (revised): [Bug 194531] db2bak is too noisy

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=194531

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437730&action=diff
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=437730&action=edit

Thanks to Nathan for his comments to the previous proposal.  Based upon the
discussion with him, changed the spec as follows:
1) leave the db2bak/bak2db's behaviour intact (verbose by default)
2) introduced a suppress option "-q" not to send the verbose messages to the
standard error, but just to the errors log.

Description: Introduced "-q" option to suppress the backing up/
restoring message for each db file.
   Usage: db2bak [archivedir] [-q] [-h]
   Usage: bak2db archivedir [-n backendname] [-q] | [-h]
If "-q" is specified, the verbose messages are not prited to
the standard error, but just to the errors log.

In addition, new log level SLAPI_LOG_BACKLDBM/LDAP_DEBUG_BACKLDBM
has been introduced.


--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Directory Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Older Fedora Users Mail]     [Fedora Advisory Board]     [Fedora Security]     [Fedora Devel Java]     [Fedora Desktop]     [ATA RAID]     [Fedora Marketing]     [Fedora Mentors]     [Fedora Package Review]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Music]     [Fedora Packaging]     [CentOS]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Art]     [Fedora Docs]

  Powered by Linux