https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=612771 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=431976&action=""> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=431976&action=""> Thanks to Rich for the good idea to enhance the procedure. > What if we do what replication conflicts do and rename the entry to > nsuniqueid=<uuid>+oldDN? or use some other unique name? Based upon the suggestion by Rich, in case duplicated DNs are found, the second DN is renamed to nsuniqueid=<uuid>+oldDN (import_foreman in import-threads.c). In addition, there was a bug to handle multi-valued RDNs in slapi_dn_normalize_ext. In case multi-valued RDN appears with DN value (e.g., nsuniqueid=<uuid>+cn=uid\=<uid>\,o\=<org>,dc=<dc>), it was not normalized properly. Introduced additional rdn_av_stack (subinitial_rdn_av_stack) for the nested DN value.
-- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
