Hi Andrew, ----- "Andrew Bartlett" <abartlet@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > - a replacement for the Samba4 rdn_name module. For OpenLDAP I have > tried out ITS#6055 but it fails, sadly. > http://www.openldap.org/its/index.cgi/Development?id=6055;selectid=6055 > I don't know of any comparable effort in Fedora DS. We're considering this proposal for FDS: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/RDN_Value At this point it's still being designed, so I can't say yet when this would become available. > - Transaction support. While most of the transaction-aware tasks in > Samba have now been either pushed off as 'too hard on LDAP' or into > modules that are now in the LDAP backend, we still do need > transactions > over LDAP. Transaction on FDS is deferred until later this year: http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/LDAP_Transactions > - A way to easily detect that we have OpenLDAP or Fedora DS > installed > on the system, and what it's version is. Once we have that, we could > start trying to run at least some of Samba4's tests against such a > backend regularly (and stop breaking it so often). The buildsamba02 machine is configured to test against FDS: http://build.samba.org/?function=View+Build;host=buildsamba02;tree=samba_4_0_test;compiler=gcc I hope there's somebody who could maintain a similar system configured with OpenLDAP. > - Some help debugging the existing 'make test' failures! I've fixed some FDS-specific failures. I'll send you the patches soon. > To address a broader range of use cases, I'm looking forward to the > work > Endi has promised for a 'ldap backend config file' as input to > provision. Hopefully this will reduce the options we have to present > to > users on the provision command line. Sorry about the delay on this. It's coming but slowly because I have to handle other issues as well. Thanks! -- Endi S. Dewata -- 389-devel mailing list 389-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
